Retirement Watch Lighthouse Logo

More on High-Frequency Trading

Last update on: Jun 22 2020

Michael Lewis caused a big stir a few months ago with his latest book on high frequency traders. He claimed that the existence of HFT means the markets are rigged. I said at the time that Lewis overstates the effect of HFT and simplifies it, mostly to sell books I think. Here’s a more reasoned and detailed discussion of HFT done anonymously but apparently by someone who’s in the business. He/she argues that HFT doesn’t really harm individual investors but probably hurts banks and other firms that made money trading the markets. HFT reduces the banks spreads and opportunities. HFT might lower trading costs for individual. The real problem, which Lewis should have addressed, is “dark pools.” These are large firms or groups of firms that essential form their own markets, trading securities among themselves off the public markets.

In order to promote transparency and reduce conflicts of interest between broker/dealers and their customers, our regulatory agencies should force all equity trading to happen on lit exchanges.

By the way, this is a problem not just with equity dark pools.  Consider trading in off-the-run treasuries ( off the run meaning not the latest issue ) or interest rate swaps, or many other securities that Wall Street banks trade for their customers

Since none of these are on the exchanges, and there is no transparent data, effective spreads paid by customers are wide, lining the bank pockets.  If regulators were able to force trading in these instruments to happen on exchanges, it would reduce fragility of the financial system and create pricing transparency

bob-carlson-signature

Retirement-Watch-Sitewide-Promo
pixel

Log In

Forgot Password

Search